One Writer’s Journey

May 11, 2017

The Scientific Method: Don’t Use It and Date Your Book

observatory-2224991_1920I have to admit that I have kind of a dicy relationship with the scientific method.  Observe. Develop a hypothesis.  Test said hypothesis.  Develop new hypothesis.  I know it and I’ve used it but sometimes it feels . . . limiting.  This was an especially serious problem when my son was doing science fair projects.  They wanted the young scientists to use the scientific method.  But these same young scientists could do an observational experiment or a model.  Umm . . . guys?  These don’t entirely sink with that whole scientific method thing.

Today I read a post on Melissa Stewart’s Celebrate Science blog. If you write about science for young readers, you need to bookmark this blog.  This particular post deals with the list of practices that are reshaping how science is taught in the schools.

As explained by Sweet, in 2012, the National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine published  A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas.  This document was written by a committee of scientists and engineers in order to provide recommendations to overhaul K-12 science education.  Why overhaul?  Because the scientific method is limited and doesn’t reflect the modern understanding of the natural world and how scientists do their work. This framework was used to develop the Next Generation Science Standards, released in 2013 and currently being implemented in schools nationwide. 

Instead of the scientific method, we now have a variety of practices.  It’s important to understand that not all of these practices are implimented in any given situation.  They are a listing of different ways that scientists and engineers answer questions and solve problems.

The practices are:

  • Asking questions (for science) and define problems (for engineering)
  • Developing and using models
  • Planning and carrying out investigations
  • Analyzing and interpreting data
  • Using mathematics and computational thinking
  • Constructing explanations (for science) and design solutions (for engineering)
  • Engaging in argument from evidence
  • Obtaining, evaluating, and communicating information

As my son, the budding chemical engineer, pointed out, this covers both discovery and development.

I’m not sure how this is going to play out in the long term but, as you write STEM related materials, be prepared to indicate which practices your book addresses.

–SueBE

Advertisements

Leave a Comment »

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: